From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
Finally I got my first Latin Mass and it was wonderful. I want more more more and I can’t understand why the Pope doesn’t want us to have it. I know he doesn’t like things he says are fussy, like lace. I saw during the Latin Mass the servers were kissing things and kissing the priest’s hand when giving things to him. Maybe that’s the sort of thing that Pope Francis doesn’t like? I have to ask why the kissing stuff is in the Latin Mass. I get the idea that things are not done by accident. It must have a point.
If you noticed that, which can happen rather quickly, you were probably sitting close and paying attention. Good for you. I recommend, however, at first, not to get too bogged down in the details. Take it in. Get used to it. That said, I won’t let you hang.
What you saw are the famous oscula, “kisses”, solita oscula, “the usual kisses”. These may be applied to objects handed to the priest, and the priest’s hand itself. They serve to show respect to the priest who is alter Christus… another Christ. They show respect to the sacred things being used and the One to whom they refer us. They show joy in the occasion and action, and to lend decorum and solemnity to the moment. Objects include the chain of the incense thurible, the spoon for the incense, his hat, cruets with wine and water, etc.
Also, it is not done everywhere. However, according to the rubrics, they are to be done.
For those who don’t know about this, in the Vetus Ordo of the Roman Rite, always in Pontifical and Solemn Masses and sometimes at Low Masses, objects are kissed as they are given to the celebrant, as is his hand. The rule is when giving, kiss the object first, then the celebrant’s hand and when getting kiss the hand first, then the object. However, when receiving a sacramental, such as a blessed palm on Palm Sunday or a blessed candle at Candlemas, you kiss the sacramental first, and then the hand.
Also, because the kiss is a sign of joy, the solita oscula are omitted on Good Friday and during Requiem Masses. Our Church is very cool. We had/have it all worked out.
The kissing of objects and hands surely spread to Holy Mass from and in a courtly context.
There’s nothing wrong with that, by the way. Critics of the traditional Roman Rite throw various accusations at it, like, “That’s just a remanent of an imperial court and it has nothing to do with Christ because Christ was humble. We need pottery and simplicity.” To which we respond: “That’s the spirit, Judas!”
There is nothing wrong with respect and decorum. Think of Luke 7 and the woman with the precious ointment.
She stood behind him at his feet, weeping, and began to bathe his feet with her tears and to dry them with her hair. Then she continued kissing his feet and anointing them with the ointment.
Sounds like a ritual to me.
Liberals accuse traditionalists of clinging to the useless bowing and scraping of ancient court practices. They won’t kneel! No! They’ve evolved beyond all that. They’re all grown up now. Liberals would rather have us, as they do, kneel and bow and scrape to the world, the flesh and the Devil.
The liturgical spirit of Judas.
The giving of solita oscula ties into the style and quality of vestments and vessels and music used for Holy Mass, as well as the music and the architecture and how congregants comport themselves. It’s all a whole.
Be clear about something! All you who attend the Traditional Latin Mass… attend!
When we dress our priests and bishops in gold and lace, and place gold on them and into their hands, we aren’t honoring the priest or bishop the man, however worthy and admirable he may be.
We kiss their hands because they were anointed to serve us.
You can hear them squeal, “But Father! But Father! I won’t do THAT! We are beyond that now! We are modern! We won’t crawl before some potentate or kneel down or receive on the tongue. This is now and all that frippery of a bygone era isn’t like the pristine early church of an Alleluia people. But you cling to that patriarchalism and backwardism because YOU HATE VATICAN II!”
It isn’t a humiliation for us to behave with decorum. We honor them, giving our best, because we honor Christ at work in them. We are grateful for the merits of the Cross and our pathway to heaven. You kiss when you love.
The priest and bishop are our mediators for the one Mediator. They are, during Holy Mass, both the priest who offers the Sacrifice, and also the Sacrificial Victim. The lambs prepared for the day of sacrifice were taken great care of and fussed over… right up to the time the knife slashed their throats open.
When you see the priest and bishop in fine vestments, remember the love and gratitude and care with which we treat sacred things and persons and places. We look to them and through them as Moses looked, straining, to glimpse the Mystery as God passed by on the other side of the cleft in the rock (cf Exodus 33).
These things and gestures are signs that facilitate the encounter with mystery that is simultaneously frightening and alluring, hard to prepare for and yet vital for our spirits. They help us to prepare, through their beauty and challenge for our own deaths.
It is wrong for a priest or bishop to refuse the kissing of his ring and hand. Acceptance of a gift honors the giver. People want to give honor and show love for Jesus, the King and Eternal Priest present before them in their person. They instinctively, and also by instruction, seek to reverence what brings them the ordinary means of salvation.
Also… and this is important… you remind the priest of who he ought to be. In a sense, to kiss the priest’s hand – as is common in some cultures – is the opposite of being subservient to him. By kissing his hand, you exert a measure of control because you underscore his reason for living: your salvation.
You kiss the priest’s hand and you are saying: “You will account.”
The kissing of the priest’s hand is an elegant, meaningful, helpful practice.
I am reminded of a poem from yesteryear which, though to our ears today it rings a bit saccharin and sentimental….
There’s nothing wrong with sentimental! There’s nothing wrong with yesteryear’s flowery language! Let us not be cynical like the interiorly withered liberals who in their faux sophistication place themselves above such things in sniffy joylessness.
Here’s the poem. It conveys perennially valuable clues about the attitude we should adopt in the present of the Lord’s anointed.
Think about the moments that the poem describes:
The Beautiful Hands of a Priest
We need them in life’s early morning,
We need them again at its close;
We feel their warm clasp of true friendship,
We seek them when tasting life’s woes.
At the altar each day we behold them,
And the hands of a king on his throne
Are not equal to them in their greatness;
Their dignity stands all alone;
And when we are tempted and wander,
To pathways of shame and of sin,
It’s the hand of a priest that will absolve us,
Not once, but again and again.
And when we are taking life’s partner,
Other hands may prepare us a feast,
But the hand that will bless and unite us
Is the beautiful hand of a priest.
God bless them and keep them all holy,
For the Host which their fingers caress;
When can a poor sinner do better
Than to ask Him to guide thee and bless?
When the hour of death comes upon us,
May our courage and strength be increased,
By seeing raised over us in blessing
The beautiful hands of a priest.
Hence… kissing the priest’s hand and objects during Holy Mass.
In the midst of chaos, we need to bring our minds to work at hand, our work of sacred liturgy, the renewal of which is our only hope for true revitalization of the Church.
I ran into a notable quote today at one of my daily stops, the estimable Laudator. The quote is from the work On the False (or Dishonest) Embassy by the ancient Athenian orator Demosthenes (+384 BC). The context is the negotiation of the “Peace of Philocrates” which dealt with a war between Athens and Macedonia’s Philip (father of Alexander). Athens sent as negotiators Philocrates, Demosthenes and Aeschines. The latter, during the negotiations, seems not to have done the best by Athens and so, later, he was tried for treason (for which he was eventually cleared). He was later prosecuted again by Demosthenes and Aeschines, though acquitted, was ruined.
The sun rose upon Rome at 06:23 and it will sink beyond sight at 19:57.



“When,” you ask, “did the sun rise in Rome today? I respond: “06:24.”


On this Wednesday after the 2nd Sunday of Easter, many who use the traditional calendar will opt to celebrate St. Joseph, Patron of the Universal Church. This was/is a moveable feast. The Mass formulary is essentially preserved, mutatis mutandis, in the Votive Mass of St. Joseph in the 1962 Missale Romanum.
Sunrise in Rome was at 06:26. Sunset in a few minutes is at 19:55.




























